In Time: Publons Seeks to Attract Reviewers and Improve Peer Review
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملReviewers in 2017
The Editors and editorial office of Open Biology would like to thank all reviewers who volunteered their time and expertise to referee manuscripts published in 2017. To provide an opportunity for recognition, we list the names of all reviewers who opted in. This article is made permanent and citeable by its digital object identifier (DOI). We encourage you to quote your contribution in your app...
متن کاملProceedings B 2016: the year in review.
Proceedings B continues to maintain its strong reputation as one of the leading organismal biology journals in the world. During 2016, we upheld our practice of rapid publication of high quality articles that are of broad interest in the biological sciences. This year, articles took on average 78 days to final acceptance and the mean time from date of submission to first decision was just 32 da...
متن کاملUnrestricted access to medical case reports
distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page SAGE Open Medical Case Reports is an open access journal that publishes short case reports providing key insights into real medical cases that are essential for physicians, and that ultimately help to improve patient outcomes. It publishes online only and do...
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 35 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017